Hawaii data on MOE reduction and CEIS use

July 14th, 2011

IDEA Money Watch has obtained the information submitted by the Hawaii Dept. of Education to the U.S. Dept. of Education regarding reduction to local spending (maintenance of effort or  MOE) and use of federal IDEA funds for Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) for each school district for the 2009 fiscal year. Get Hawaii information here. (PDF,  3 pgs).

NOTE: The information submitted by Hawaii for its 2009 allotment of federal funds for IDEA Section 611 does not appear to reflect Recovery Act funds. We are investigating this issue.

This information is important because it indicates if school districts reduced local spending in light of IDEA Recovery Act funds in FY 2009. IDEA does not require that local districts replace these funds when the Recovery funds run out, putting services for students with disabilities at risk.

SEPTEMBER 2010 :: Hawaii IDEA Recovery Act spending tops $20 million (50% of available funds)

October 9th, 2010

According to spending reports released by the U.S. Dept. of Education, Hawaii has obligated 50% of its IDEA Part B Recovery funds, or $20,002,335 as of September 30, 2010. The national average is 50%.

Current spending reports are always available here. All IDEA Recovery Act funds must be obligated by September 30, 2011.

Hard times not over for state’s schools

July 1st, 2010

BOE members warn a furlough-free year will probably mean cuts in other areas

By Mary Vorsino The Star Advertiser

Public school students will not see teacher furlough days in the coming school year, but they will feel the pinch of budget cuts in other ways, Board of Education members warned.

The board approved an operating budget yesterday for the 2010-11 school year that includes $1.25 billion from the state’s general fund and the elimination of about 400 mostly vacant positions. The bulk of the positions – about 230 – are in special education.

Eliminating the positions will save the department about $15 million and could include some layoffs.

DOE officials could not say how many people would be laid off, however, because some could be shifted to other programs.

Eliminating the vacant positions saves money because the department has to budget for them, though they cannot fill them because of a hiring freeze.

Advocates and parents worry the positions will not be restored once the budget picture improves.

Marialena Kalamau, a parent of a special-needs child, urged the department yesterday to use caution in its cuts to special education and asked officials to find other ways to save money.

“I’m here on behalf of all families with children who have disabilities,” she said at the special board meeting. The cuts are “detrimental to our children.”

Schools Superintendent Kathryn Matayoshi said the department is “trying to minimize the impact” of cuts to special-education programs.

The $15 million in cuts was originally going to be directed only at special-education programs, mostly by eliminating positions. Officials decided to spread the cuts to other departments, however – a move applauded by the board.

Still, board members said the cuts are the latest hit for a department scrambling to meet federal and state mandates in tough fiscal times. Some worried about what the cumulative effects of the cuts will be on schools, and urged the department to closely monitor student progress, especially in special-education classrooms.

“The budget cuts are getting so deep that there is a direct or indirect impact on schools,” board member Breene Harimoto said yesterday at the meeting. “The fact of the matter is that everyone’s hurting.”

Board member Margaret Cox added, “None of us want to cut anywhere, but we’re at the point where we don’t have a choice.”

The department says it has been hit with $141 million in general fund reductions to its operating budget for the upcoming school year.

In all, the department estimates its state funding has been slashed by about $503 million over the 2009-2011 biennium – through cuts, budget restrictions, a hiring freeze, reductions in nonlabor costs and other cost-saving measures.

The dire budget situation last school year was most notable for setting in motion 17 teacher furlough days, which left Hawaii public school students with the shortest school year in the nation and spurred widespread criticism, including from U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan.

The furloughs ended in May, thanks to a deal that included $57 million from the hurricane relief fund and a $10 million, interest-free line of credit from local banks.

Garrett Toguchi, board chairman, said he worries that all the cuts made in bad times will not be undone when things get better. “As you can see, people are starting to get used to the cuts,” he said.

To help offset the hit to schools, legislators in the last session put an extra $22 million into the weighted student formula (even as big cuts were being made elsewhere to the department’s budget).

Schools can use that money at their discretion, diverting it to their biggest needs, and officials hope it will help alleviate some of the pain from budget cuts.

“It means they have to prioritize,” said state Sen. Norman Sakamoto, chairman of the education and housing committee.

James Brese, Department of Education chief financial officer, pointed out the budget cuts have largely been directed at administrative and complex-area offices, not at the school level.

The funding to complex area offices has declined 20 percent from 2007, while administrative-level funding declined 30 percent. Funding to schools makes up about 72 percent of the department’s budget and has declined 3 percent from 2007.

But Brese said all the cuts, mainly to support staff and offices, will no doubt be felt at the school level. “We believe it will have an impact,” he said. “We just don’t know to what extent.”

Appeals court affirms ruling denying furlough Friday injunction

April 8th, 2010

From the Honolulu Advertiser:

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today affirmed a ruling that protects Hawaii’s teacher furlough program against a federal legal challenge by a group of special education students and their parents.

In its 20-page decision, the Court of Appeals said: “To allow the stay-put provisions to apply in this instance would be essentially to give the parents of disabled children veto power over a state’s decision regarding the management of its schools.

“The (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) did not intend to strip administrative powers away from local school boards and give them to parents of individual children, and we do not read it as doing so.”

Circuit Judge A. Wallace Tashima originally ruled in November that while special education students might suffer “irreparable harm” because of teacher furloughs, ordering schools to reopen would cause more harm than good to the overall public interest.

The request for an injunction against furlough Fridays was brought on behalf of seven families with special education students at five schools.

Lawyers for the group argued that the furloughs violated Individual Education Plans for disabled students.

IEPs are federally mandated agreements between parents of special needs students and the state. The contracts are drawn up on an individual basis for about 17,000 special education students and typically specify the number of hours a student should receive of therapeutic services, such as speech therapy, skills training, occupational therapy of counseling.

Superintendent’s term resulted in higher test scores, BOE support

January 2nd, 2010

January 1, 2010

Superintendent’s term resulted in higher test scores, BOE support

By Loren Moreno
Advertiser Staff Writer

State schools superintendent Pat Hamamoto, who resigned yesterday, enjoyed strong support from the state Board of Education, with her original four-year contract renewed twice.

Hamamoto inherited the public school system in 2001 just as the state and the rest of the nation were subjected to the unprecedented federal mandates of No Child Left Behind.

Her success in raising test scores gained her the respect of many educators and meant she likely could have kept her job beyond the end of her current term, which was 10 months away.

Board member Donna Ikeda said there was no reason to believe her contract would not have been renewed if she had chosen to seek a longer term.

“She’s probably one of the longest serving superintendents, and for good reason,” Ikeda said. “She’s always been for the kids, from the first time I met her, the kids always came first. She’s done a very good job.”

Under her leadership, student test scores under NCLB testing have drastically increased in the core subject areas of both reading and math, though the majority of Hawai’i schools are beginning to miss federal targets as expectations increase toward the 2014 deadline when all students will be required to show proficiency.

About 65 percent of public school students were proficient in reading last year. That compares with 39 percent when testing began in 2002. Likewise, 44 percent of students demonstrated proficiency in math, compared with 19 percent in 2002.

“She was saddled with the requirements of No Child Left Behind right in her first year. We are where we are today thanks to her leadership,” Ikeda said.

Hamamoto always considered herself an educator first, Ikeda said, but it can be said that she embraced the political nature of her job in 2004 in her unprecedented speech before a joint session of the state House and Senate. The speech came just two days after Gov. Linda Lingle delivered her State of the State address outlining her plans for education reform.

Hamamoto’s speech set the stage for the state’s reform of the public school system known as the Reinventing Education Act of 2004, or Act 51. The legislation changed the way the DOE handled its budget, giving individual school principals control over an increased portion of their campus’ money. It mandated a unified calendar for all public schools, reduced class sizes, and required the DOE to take over services previously handled by other state agencies, such as bus service and the construction process, reducing the time it takes for schools to see repairs, maintenance and new construction.

While Hamamoto had unwavering support from the state Board of Education, her department often butted heads with Lingle’s administration, most notably over issues such as the proposal to establish seven school boards across the state as opposed to one, funding teacher drug testing, and even the current furloughs of public school teachers.

Most recently, Lingle claimed there was a lack of accountability in the public school system, and proposed a constitutional amendment for the upcoming session to make the DOE a Cabinet-level department, under the governor’s control.

In June, Lingle cut the Department of Education budget by 13.85 percent, or $270.3 million, over two years. When budget cuts from the state Legislature were added, the $1.8 billion public school budget was cut by $468 million.

Those cuts prompted negotiations with the Hawaii State Teachers Association, which resulted in a two-year contract that included 17 furlough days a year.

Since that contract was announced, Hamamoto and the state administration had been working together to reduce the number of furlough days, first by allowing schools to reassign a limited number of planning days as instruction days, and then through a combination of using money from the state’s rainy-day fund and reassigning planning days.

Garrett Toguchi, chairman of the state Board of Education, said he could not point to any one reason why the superintendent decided to end her time in the DOE before her contract expired. He said she was frustrated by the furlough situation, but it was not the reason she cited for leaving.

“She has been around for a long time and faced a lot of difficult times as superintendent,” he said. “She said it was just time for her to take a break, for other people to take over.”

Lawsuits aim to block Hawaii’s school furlough days

November 2nd, 2009

HawaiiAdvertiser.com

A pair of federal lawsuits filed on behalf of special education and other students have the potential to keep some public schools open tomorrow despite the state’s plan to furlough teachers on 17 Fridays, attorneys for the plaintiffs said yesterday.
The attorneys for nine families of special education students on Oahu, Maui and the Big Island who want their children in school and around their classmates for the “furlough Fridays” hope to get a hearing today before Judge David Ezra in U.S. District Court seeking a temporary injunction.


The lawsuit alleges that the furloughs imposed on schools by the Department of Education constitute an unlawful unilateral change in the programs and services that special-needs children receive. Full article is here.

US Education Secretary took the state to task in an op-ed that appeared in the Honolulu Advertiser. In the column, Duncan wrote that while the state’s students have been making “steady gains” in their academic achievement, cutting the school calendar to save money was a “step in the wrong direction. It’s inconceivable to me that this is the best solution for Hawaii.” He also said he will work with the state’s Congressional delegation to help in some way, but the only place the problem can be resolved is in Hawaii by local and state leaders.

Welcome to IDEA Money Watch for Hawaii!

April 8th, 2009

Aloha! Hawaii will receive $39,925,269 from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to improve special education services to its 17,964 school-aged students with disabilities.

We will report on how Hawaii is using these additional funds and how the academic achievement of students with disabilities is improving as a result.

Please share your comments and experiences.